Market and Industry

Europe's D2D Plan Puts Service Control Ahead of Constellation Ownership

Space Insights EditorialOctober 20, 20264 min read
ShareLinkedInEmail
Editorial illustration of a satellite, ground antenna and smartphone above Europe, with the headline Europe’s D2D choice.

Space Insights editorial illustration of direct-to-device connectivity; not a depiction of the proposed network or its selected constellation.

Deutsche Telekom, Orange, Telefónica and Vodafone want European governance of satellite-to-phone connectivity without directly investing in the satellites. Their 19 October Letter of Intent explores a joint bid for European mobile satellite services spectrum, with a constellation supplied by a partner still to be selected. The operators plan to establish key ground infrastructure, coordination and monitoring functions in Europe. Joint announcement.

That proposal arrives ahead of a concrete regulatory deadline. Existing national authorisations in the EU's 2 GHz mobile satellite services band expire in May 2027. Read together, the approaching expiry and the operators' initiative put a specific industrial choice into focus: how much European control can be secured through the service network, and how much depends on the constellation behind it?

A spectrum decision with an industrial consequence

The current permissions trace back to the Commission's 2009 selection of Inmarsat, now Viasat, and Solaris, now EchoStar. Member States subsequently granted national authorisations for eighteen years. The Commission's May 2025 consultation set out options for what follows their expiry, including renewal and a new selection procedure. Commission consultation context.

On 27 May 2026, the Commission proposed a new EU-level selection and authorisation procedure for the band. Its stated aim is to enable services across borders under consistent rules. The four operators are exploring a position in that future allocation process; their Letter of Intent establishes neither a spectrum award nor an operating service. Commission proposal announcement.

The timing connects a familiar debate about European autonomy to the terms on which a market could develop. A spectrum framework can shape access to customers across Europe. The partnership using those rights then determines which ground and space capabilities it draws upon. European participation at one stage does not settle ownership throughout the system.

European service control already has a concrete example

Satellite Connect Europe, Vodafone's joint venture with AST SpaceMobile, illustrates the service-control model. Its February launch announcement described investment in five European ground stations and European-operated access to AST's satellite network. Vodafone says the arrangement keeps network operations, data handling and service control within European jurisdiction, while mobile operators retain their customer relationships. Satellite Connect Europe announcement.

These are substantial functions: they concern how satellite coverage enters an existing mobile service and how that service is run. They also show that a European service organisation can be built around a separately supplied constellation. The sovereignty claim therefore needs to be assessed against the functions it actually covers.

The October initiative sets out a related ambition for European ground functions and open, non-discriminatory access for other mobile operators. It also explicitly preserves existing satellite partnerships. Vodafone's participation in both arrangements provides context for the model; the new initiative's constellation partner remains unselected.

Two different ambitions for European industry

ESPI's 14 October brief advances a broader test: European autonomy should encompass mobile operators, satellite operators and spacecraft manufacturers. It warns that European spectrum and customer-facing brands could otherwise support expansion of foreign space assets. This is a policy argument about the breadth of industrial participation. ESPI brief.

That distinction makes the operator proposal more revealing than a simple list of partners. Its proposed European ground functions create a route to greater control over service delivery. European ownership and production of the space segment would require additional commitments. The operators themselves include support for a European constellation among their ambitions, while assigning constellation provision to an external partner.

For European satellite manufacturers, that gap is commercially meaningful. A European-led spectrum initiative alone does not establish demand for European-built spacecraft. For ground-network and mobile-service businesses, the plan already names functions they can recognise in a prospective service architecture. The decisive industrial detail will be how the selected constellation and access terms connect these two ambitions as the spectrum process advances.

Get briefings like this every Friday.

Subscribe